Services
Industrial Data and AI
Practical application of data and AI to real industrial problems.

Our approach
What we actually do
Practical application of data and AI to real industrial problems: process optimization, predictive maintenance on historian data, on-premise technical chatbots based on RAG, MLOps in regulated environments.
Pragmatic approach, no experimental demos: everything we deploy must work in operation and survive a quality audit.

Our expertise
- Business Intelligence and operational dashboards (Power BI)
- On-premise technical chatbots based on RAG for troubleshooting support
- Process optimization through machine learning (Python, TensorFlow, Azure ML)
- Predictive maintenance on historian data (PI System, Wonderware Historian)
- MLOps and operational reliability of production models
- AI validation in GMP environments (audit trail, explainability, traceability)
- Internal team training for data tool appropriation
- Industrialisation of ad-hoc analyses (critical Excel, scripts) into maintainable, versioned and auditable data tools
Use cases and references
Technologies used:
Frequently asked questions
Why use an on-premise AI instead of a standard cloud LLM?
On a regulated site, confidentiality policy often rules out sending technical documentation or failure history through an external cloud service. That was exactly the situation for a pharma site where we built a fully on-premise RAG chatbot, with the model and the vector database hosted locally, because a cloud LLM was off the table from the start. That constraint is part of the brief from day one, not a fix added afterward.
Do you build AI demos or only projects that actually run in production?
We do not deliver experimental demos that stay at prototype stage. Everything we deploy has to work in real operation and survive a quality audit, with audit trail, explainability and traceability designed in from the start in GMP environments. If a use case cannot meet that bar, we say so before starting, not after delivery.
How do you start a predictive maintenance project on our historian data?
We start by looking at what already exists on site: PI System, Wonderware Historian or another source, plus the CMMS failure history. On the pharma maintenance chatbot project, the first phase was a Business Intelligence analysis of over 10 years of CMMS tickets to spot recurring failures, before any predictive model was even discussed. That step is what shows whether a predictive maintenance project has a real chance on your actual data.
How do you stop an AI chatbot from giving a technician a wrong answer?
The chatbot runs on RAG, Retrieval-Augmented Generation: it does not answer from memory, it draws on the site's technical documentation, maintenance procedures and failure history to build each recommendation. In GMP environments we add explainability and traceability of the sources used, so a technician can check an answer instead of just taking it on faith.
Once an AI model is in production, how is it kept reliable over time?
A model running in production drifts over time if nobody watches it: data changes, the process evolves. The MLOps side covers exactly that, tracking the operational reliability of models once deployed, not just their initial tuning. That is what separates a model that gets demoed once from a model that can still be audited a year later.
Do we need a big AI project to get started, or can we start small?
No. A large part of this service is plain Business Intelligence: Power BI dashboards, and turning analyses still running on critical Excel files or ad-hoc scripts into versioned, auditable tools. A more advanced project like a RAG chatbot or a predictive model usually builds on that groundwork, it does not replace it.
Contact
A project to scope out?
Tell us about your need and your timeline constraints. We come back quickly with a clear scope.